Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)

v3.6.0.2
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Jan. 01, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Crown Crafts, Inc. (the “Company”) and its subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) applicable to interim financial information as promulgated by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. References herein to GAAP are to topics within the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “FASB ASC”), which has been established by the FASB as the authoritative source for GAAP to be applied by nongovernmental entities.
 
In the opinion of management, the interim unaudited consolidated financial statements contained herein include all adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of
January
1,
2017
and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Such adjustments include normal, recurring accruals, as well as the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions. Operating results for the
three
and
nine
-month periods ended
January
1,
2017
are not necessarily indicative of the results that
may
be expected by the Company for its fiscal year ending
April
2,
2017.
For further information, refer to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s annual report on Form
10
-K for the fiscal year ended
April
3,
2016.
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Reclassifications:
The Company has reclassified certain prior year information to conform to the amounts presented in the current year. None of the changes impact the Company’s previously reported financial position or results of operations.
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Fiscal Year:
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the Sunday that is nearest to or on
March
31.
References herein to “fiscal year
2017”
or
“2017”
represent the
52
-week period ending
April
2,
2017
and references herein to “fiscal year
2016”
or
“2016”
represent the
53
-week period ended
April
3,
2016.
Use of Estimates, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Use of Estimates:
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented on the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of income and cash flows. Significant estimates are made with respect to the allowances related to accounts receivable for customer deductions for returns, allowances and disputes. The Company also has a certain amount of discontinued finished products which necessitates the establishment of inventory reserves and allocates indirect costs to inventory based on an estimated percentage of the supplier purchase price, each of which is highly subjective. The Company has also established estimated reserves in connection with the uncertainty concerning the amount of income tax recognized. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The Company considers highly-liquid investments, if any, purchased with original maturities of
three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
 
The Company’s credit facility consists of a revolving line of credit under a financing agreement with The CIT Group/Commercial Services, Inc. (“CIT”), a subsidiary of CIT Group, Inc. The Company classifies a negative balance outstanding under this revolving line of credit as cash, as these amounts are legally owed to the Company and are immediately available to be drawn upon by the Company. There are no compensating balance requirements or other restrictions on the transfer of amounts associated with the Company’s depository accounts.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Financial Instruments
:
For short-term instruments such as cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the Company uses carrying value as a reasonable estimate of the fair value.
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Revenue Recognition:
Sales are recorded when products are shipped to customers and are reported net of allowances for estimated returns and allowances in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. Allowances for returns are estimated based on historical rates. Allowances for returns, cooperative advertising allowances, warehouse allowances, placement fees and volume rebates are recorded commensurate with sales activity or using the straight-line method, as appropriate, and the cost of such allowances is netted against sales in reporting the results of operations. Shipping and handling costs, net of amounts reimbursed by customers, are not material and are included in net sales.
Receivables, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Allowances Against Accounts Receivable
: The Company’s allowances against accounts receivable are primarily contractually agreed-upon deductions for items such as cooperative advertising and warehouse allowances, placement fees and volume rebates. These deductions are recorded throughout the year commensurate with sales activity or using the straight-line method, as appropriate. Funding of the majority of the Company’s allowances occurs on a per-invoice basis. The allowances for customer deductions, which are netted against accounts receivable in the condensed consolidated balance sheets, consist of agreed upon advertising support, placement fees, markdowns and warehouse and other allowances. All such allowances are recorded as direct offsets to sales, and such costs are accrued commensurate with sales activities or as a straight-line amortization charge of an agreed-upon fixed amount, as appropriate to the circumstances for each such arrangement. When a customer requests deductions, the allowances are reduced to reflect such payments or credits issued against the customer’s account balance. The Company analyzes the components of the allowances for customer deductions monthly and adjusts the allowances to the appropriate levels. The timing of funding requests for advertising support can cause the net balance in the allowance account to fluctuate from period to period. The timing of such funding requests should have no impact on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income since such costs are accrued commensurate with sales activity or using the straight-line method, as appropriate.
 
To reduce the exposure to credit losses and to enhance the predictability of its cash flows, the Company assigns the majority of its trade accounts receivable under factoring agreements with CIT. In the event a factored receivable becomes uncollectible due to creditworthiness, CIT bears the risk of loss. The Company’s management must make estimates of the uncollectibility of its non-factored accounts receivable to evaluate the adequacy of the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts, which is accomplished by specifically analyzing accounts receivable, historical bad debts, customer concentrations, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in its customers’ payment terms.
 
The Company’s accounts receivable as of
January
1,
2017
was
$14.5
million, net of allowances of
$1.0
million. Of this amount,
$14.0
million was due from CIT under the factoring agreements. An additional
$14.4
million was due from CIT as a negative balance outstanding under the revolving line of credit, which is included in cash and cash equivalents in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet. The combined amount of
$28.4
million represents the maximum loss that the Company could incur if CIT failed completely to perform its obligations under the factoring agreements and the revolving line of credit.
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Segment and Related Information:
The Company operates primarily in
one
principal segment, infant, toddler and juvenile products. These products consist of infant and toddler bedding, bibs, soft bath products, disposable products and accessories. Net sales of bedding, blankets and accessories and net sales of bibs, bath and disposable products for the
three
and
nine
months ended
January
1,
2017
and
December
27,
2015
are as follows (in thousands):
 
 
 
Three-Month Periods Ended
 
 
Nine-Month Periods Ended
 
 
 
January 1, 2017
 
 
December 27, 2015
 
 
January 1, 2017
 
 
December 27, 2015
 
Bedding, blankets and accessories
  $
11,445
    $
15,821
    $
31,847
    $
42,456
 
Bibs, bath and disposable products
   
5,817
     
4,870
     
16,823
     
16,809
 
Total net sales
  $
17,262
    $
20,691
    $
48,670
    $
59,265
 
Revenue Recognition, Services, Royalty Fees [Policy Text Block]
Royalty Payments:
The Company has entered into agreements that provide for royalty payments based on a percentage of sales with certain minimum guaranteed amounts. These royalties are accrued based upon historical sales rates adjusted for current sales trends by customers. Royalty expense is included in cost of products sold in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income and amounted to
$1.9
million and
$2.3
million for the
three
-month periods ended
January
1,
2017
and
December
27,
2015,
respectively, and
$5.2
million and
$6.3
million for the
nine
-month periods ended
January
1,
2017
and
December
27,
2015,
respectively.
Depreciation, Depletion, and Amortization [Policy Text Block]
Depreciation and Amortization:
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets reflect property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets other than goodwill at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization. The Company capitalizes additions and improvements and expenses maintenance and repairs as incurred. Depreciation and amortization are computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, which are
three
to
eight
years for property, plant and equipment, and
five
to
twenty
years for intangible assets other than goodwill. The Company amortizes improvements to its leased facilities over the term of the lease or the estimated useful life of the asset, whichever is shorter.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets
and
Identifiable Intangible Assets:
In addition to the depreciation and amortization procedures set forth above, the Company reviews for impairment property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets other than goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any asset
may
not be recoverable. In the event of impairment, the asset is written down to its fair market value.
Intangible Assets, Finite-Lived, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Patent Costs:
The Company incurs certain legal and associated costs in connection with applications for patents. The Company capitalizes such costs to be amortized over the expected life of the patent to the extent that an economic benefit is anticipated from the resulting patent or an alternative future use for the underlying product is available to the Company. The Company also capitalizes legal and other costs incurred in the protection or defense of the Company’s patents to the extent that it is believed that the future economic benefit of the patent will be maintained or increased and a successful outcome of the litigation is probable. Capitalized patent protection or defense costs are amortized over the remaining expected life of the related patent. The Company’s assessment of the future economic benefit of its patents involves considerable management judgment, and a different conclusion could result in a material impairment charge up to the carrying value of these assets.
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Inventory Valuation:
The preparation of the Company's financial statements requires careful determination of the appropriate value of the Company's inventory balances. Such amounts are presented as a current asset in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and are a direct determinant of cost of products sold in the unaudited consolidated statements of income and, therefore, have a significant impact on the amount of net income in the accounting periods reported. The basis of accounting for inventories is cost, which includes the direct supplier acquisition cost, duties, taxes and freight, and the indirect costs incurred to design, develop, source and store the products until they are sold. Once cost has been determined, the Company’s inventory is then stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined using the
first
-in,
first
-out ("FIFO") method, which assumes that inventory quantities are sold in the order in which they are acquired.
 
The indirect costs allocated to inventory are done so as a percentage of projected annual supplier purchases and can impact the Company’s results of operations as purchase volume fluctuates from quarter to quarter and year to year. The difference between indirect costs incurred and the indirect costs allocated to inventory creates a burden variance, which is generally favorable when actual inventory purchases exceed planned inventory purchases, and is generally unfavorable when actual inventory purchases are lower than planned inventory purchases. While the burden variance can be significant during interim periods, it is generally not material by the end of each fiscal year. The determination of the indirect charges and their allocation to the Company's finished products inventories is complex and requires significant management judgment and estimates. If management made different judgments or utilized different estimates, then differences would result in the valuation of the Company's inventories, the amount and timing of the Company's cost of products sold and the resulting net income for any accounting period.
 
On a periodic basis, management reviews the Company’s inventory quantities on hand for obsolescence, physical deterioration, changes in price levels and the existence of quantities on hand which
may
not reasonably be expected to be sold within the normal operating cycle of the Company's operations. To the extent that any of these conditions is believed to exist or the market value of the inventory expected to be realized in the ordinary course of business is otherwise no longer as great as its carrying value, an allowance against the inventory value is established. To the extent that this allowance is established or increased during an accounting period, an expense is recorded in cost of products sold in the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income. Only when inventory for which an allowance has been established is later sold or is otherwise disposed of is the allowance reduced accordingly. Significant management judgment is required in determining the amount and adequacy of this allowance. In the event that actual results differ from management's estimates or these estimates and judgments are revised in future periods, the Company
may
not fully realize the carrying value of its inventory or
may
need to establish additional allowances, either of which could materially impact the Company's financial position and results of operations.
Advertising Costs, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Advertising Cost
s
:
The Company’s advertising costs are primarily associated with cooperative advertising arrangements with certain of the Company’s customers and are recognized using the straight-line method based upon aggregate annual estimated amounts for those customers, with periodic adjustments to the actual amounts of authorized agreements. Advertising expense is included in marketing and administrative expenses in the accompanying unaudited consolidated statements of income and amounted to
$168,000
and
$271,000
for the
three
-month periods ended
January
1,
2017
and
December
27,
2015,
respectively, and
$666,000
and
$840,000
for the
nine
-month periods ended
January
1,
2017
and
December
27,
2015,
respectively.
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Provision for Income Taxes:
The Company’s provision for income taxes includes all currently payable federal, state, local and foreign taxes and is based upon the Company’s estimated annual effective tax rate, which is based on the Company’s forecasted annual pre-tax income, as adjusted for certain expenses that will never be deductible on the Company’s tax returns and certain charges expected to be deducted on the Company’s tax returns that will never be deducted on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of income, multiplied by the statutory tax rates for the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates and reduced by certain anticipated tax credits. The Company provides for deferred income taxes based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. The Company’s policy is to recognize the effect that a change in enacted tax rates would have on net deferred income tax assets and liabilities in the period that the tax rates are changed.
 
Management evaluates items of income, deductions and credits reported on the Company’s various federal and state income tax returns filed and recognizes the effect of positions taken on those income tax returns only if those positions are more likely than not to be sustained. The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC Sub-topic
740
-
10
-
25,
which requires a minimum recognition threshold that a tax benefit must meet before being recognized in the financial statements. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that has a greater than
50%
likelihood of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. The Company’s policy is to accrue interest expense and penalties as appropriate on any estimated unrecognized tax benefits as a charge to interest expense. Interest expense or penalties are not accrued with respect to estimated unrecognized tax benefits that are associated with claims for income tax refunds as long as the overpayments are receivable.
 
The Company files income tax returns in the many jurisdictions within which it operates, including the U.S., several U.S. states and the People’s Republic of China. The statute of limitations for the Company’s filed income tax returns varies by jurisdiction; the tax years open to federal, state or Chinese examination or other adjustment as of
January
1,
2017
were the fiscal years ended
April
1,
2012,
March
31,
2013,
March
30,
2014,
March
29,
2015
and
April
3,
2016,
as well as the fiscal year ended
April
3,
2011
for California.
 
In
December
2016,
the Company received notification from the State of California of its intention to examine the Company’s consolidated income tax returns for the fiscal years ended
April
3,
2011,
April
1,
2012,
March
31,
2013
and
March
30,
2014.
The ultimate resolution of the examination could include administrative or legal proceedings. Although management believes that the calculations and positions taken on these and all other filed income tax returns are reasonable and justifiable, the outcome of this or any other examination could result in an adjustment to the position that the Company took on such income tax returns. Such adjustment could also lead to adjustments to
one
or more other state income tax returns, or to income tax returns for subsequent fiscal years, or both. To the extent that the Company’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits is not adequate to support the cumulative effect of such adjustments, the Company could experience a material adverse impact on its future results of operations. Conversely, to the extent that the calculations and positions taken by the Company on the filed income tax returns under examination are sustained, the reversal of all or a portion of the Company’s reserve for unrecognized tax benefits could result in a favorable impact on its future results of operations.
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Earnings Per Share:
The Company calculates basic earnings per share by using a weighted average of the number of shares outstanding during the reporting periods. Diluted shares outstanding are calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method, which assumes that the proceeds from the exercise of all exercisable options would be used to repurchase shares at market value. The net number of shares issued after the exercise proceeds are exhausted represents the potentially dilutive effect of the options, which are added to basic shares to arrive at diluted shares.
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Recently-Issued Accounting Standards:
In
2014,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No.
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606)
, which will replace most existing GAAP guidance on revenue recognition, and which will require the use of more estimates and judgments, as well as additional disclosures. When issued, the ASU was to become effective in the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2016,
but on
August
12,
2015
the FASB issued ASU No.
2015
-
14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606):
Deferral of the Effective Date
, which provides for a
one
-year deferral of the effective date to apply the guidance of ASU No.
2014
-
09.
Early adoption was originally not permitted in ASU No.
2014
-
09,
but ASU No.
2015
-
14
now permits early adoption in the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2016.
The Company is currently evaluating the effect that its adoption of ASU Nos.
2014
-
09
and
2015
-
14
on
April
3,
2017
will have on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.
 
In
July
2015,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2015
-
11,
Inventory (Topic
330):
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
, which will clarify that after an entity determines the cost of its inventory, the subsequent measurement and presentation of such inventory should be at the lower of cost or net realizable value. The ASU will become effective for the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2016.
The ASU should be applied prospectively, and early adoption is permitted. The Company intends to adopt ASU No.
2015
-
11
on
April
3,
2017,
and is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of the ASU will have on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.
 
In
November
2015,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2015
-
17,
Income Taxes (Topic
740):
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
, the intent of which was to simplify the presentation of deferred taxes by requiring all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on an entity’s balance sheet. ASU No.
2015
-
17
was to have become effective for the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2016,
and early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the ASU
may
be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company elected to early-adopt ASU No.
2015
-
17
effective as of
April
4,
2016
using a prospective application. As such, the condensed consolidated balance sheet presented as of
April
3,
2016
in the accompanying consolidated financial statements has not been adjusted. The adoption of the ASU on
April
4,
2016
resulted in the reclassification in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet as of
January
1,
2017
of
$454,000
in deferred tax assets from current to non-current. The adoption of the ASU did not have an impact on the Company’s results of operations.
 
On
February
25,
2016,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2016
-
02,
Leases (Topic
842)
, which will increase transparency and comparability by requiring an entity to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on its balance sheet and by requiring the disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. Under the provisions of ASU No.
2016
-
02,
the Company will be required to capitalize most of its current operating lease obligations as right-of-use assets with corresponding liabilities based upon the present value of the future cash outflows associated with such operating lease obligations. The ASU will become effective for the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2018.
The ASU is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach, and early adoption is permitted. The Company has not yet decided whether to adopt the ASU early and is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of the ASU will have on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.
 
On
March
30,
2016,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2016
-
09,
Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic
718):
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, the intent of which was to simplify the accounting for share-based compensation transactions while maintaining or improving the usefulness of the related disclosures. ASU No.
2016
-
09
was to have become
effective for the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2016,
and early adoption is permitted. Upon adoption, the ASU
may
be applied prospectively or retrospectively. The Company elected to early-adopt ASU No.
2016
-
09
effective as of
April
4,
2016
using a prospective application. Accordingly, the prior periods presented in the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have not been adjusted.
 
The provisions of ASU No.
2016
-
09
that are applicable to the Company and the effect of the adoption of the ASU on the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements
include the following:
 
 
*
Under previous GAAP, upon the exercise of a stock option or the vesting of non-vested stock, the Company was required to recognize the tax effect of the difference between the deduction for tax purposes and the compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes in additional paid-in capital. The provisions of the ASU require the recognition of the excess tax benefit or deficiency as an income tax benefit or expense, respectively, in the Company’s statement of income. The Company’s election to early-adopt the ASU effective as of
April
4,
2016
resulted in the recognition of net excess tax benefits amounting to
$6,000
and
$248,000
as a reduction to the Company’s reported income tax expense for the
three
and
nine
months ended
January
1,
2017,
respectively. The effect of the adoption of the ASU on the Company’s future results of operations will depend on such factors as the timing and extent of the exercise of stock options and the vesting of non-vested stock, as well as the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock on the dates of such events. The inherent uncertainty surrounding the details of these factors dictates that the future effects of the adoption of ASU No.
2016
-
09
on the Company’s results of operations cannot be reasonably estimated.
 
 
*
Under previous GAAP, excess tax benefits were classified as a financing activity in the Company’s statement of cash flows. The provisions of ASU No.
2016
-
09
require that excess tax benefits be classified as an operating activity in the Company’s statement of cash flows. The Company’s election to early-adopt ASU No.
2016
-
09
effective as of
April
4,
2016
resulted in the classification of excess tax benefits amounting to
$250,000
as cash provided by operating activities during the
nine
-month period ended
January
1,
2017.
 
 
*
The provisions of ASU No.
2016
-
09
clarify that cash paid by the Company to taxing authorities on behalf of an employee to reflect the value of shares withheld from the exercise of options or the vesting of non-vested stock to satisfy the income tax withholding obligations arising from such exercise or vesting should be classified as a financing activity in the Company’s statement of cash flows. As this treatment is consistent with the Company’s long-standing practice, the Company’s adoption of ASU No.
2016
-
09
effective as of
April
4,
2016
did not result in a difference in the reported amount of the Company’s cash used in financing activities during the
nine
months ended
January
1,
2017
as a result of this provision in the ASU.
 
On
June
16,
2016,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2016
-
13,
Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic
326):
Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
, the objective of which is to provide financial statement users with more information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by an entity. Current GAAP requires an “incurred loss” methodology for recognizing credit losses that delays recognition until it is probable that a loss has been incurred. Because this methodology restricted the recognition of credit losses that are expected, but did not yet meet the “probable” threshhold, ASU No.
2016
-
13
was issued to require the consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information when determining estimates of credit losses. The ASU will become effective for the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2019.
The ASU is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach, and the ASU
may
be early-adopted as of the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2018.
Although the Company has not yet decided whether to adopt ASU No.
2016
-
13
early or determined the full impact of the adoption of the ASU, because the Company assigns the majority of its trade accounts receivable under factoring agreements with CIT, the Company does not believe that its adoption of ASU No.
2016
-
13
will have a significant impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.
 
On
January
26,
2017,
the FASB issued ASU No.
2017
-
04,
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic
350):
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. Current GAAP requires a
two
-step approach to test for the impairment of goodwill, which is outlined in Note
3
below. The intent of ASU No.
2017
-
04
is to simplify this process by eliminating the
second
step from the goodwill impairment test. The ASU will become effective for the
first
interim period of the fiscal year beginning after
December
15,
2019.
The ASU is to be applied on a prospective basis, and the ASU
may
be early-adopted as of the
first
interim or annual goodwill impairment test performed on or after
January
1,
2017.
The Company has not yet decided whether to adopt the ASU early and is currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of the ASU will have on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.
 
The Company has determined that all other ASUs which had become effective as of
January
1,
2017,
or which will become effective at some future date, are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements.