| Note 7 - Contingencies | 6 Months Ended | 
|---|---|
| Sep. 30, 2012 | |
| Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Text Block] | 
      Note
      7 – Contingencies
     
      BreathableBaby,
      LLC (“BreathableBaby”) filed a complaint against
      the Company and Crown Crafts Infant Products, Inc.
      (“CCIP”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the
      Company, on January 11, 2012 in the United States District
      Court for the District of Minnesota, alleging that
      CCIP’s mesh crib liner infringes BreathableBaby’s
      patent rights relating to its air permeable infant bedding
      technology. The Company believes that it has meritorious
      defenses to the claims asserted in the complaint, and the
      Company intends to defend itself vigorously against all such
      claims.  The Company and CCIP filed a motion for
      summary judgment of non-infringement on May 14,
      2012.  On July 25, 2012, the Court entered an order
      denying that motion without prejudice to refiling it at the
      close of discovery.  In doing so, the Court did not
      rule on the merits of the Company’s motion, but instead
      determined that further discovery was required before a
      motion for summary judgment could be
      decided.  Discovery accordingly was resumed and
      remained ongoing as of September 30, 2012.
     
      CCIP
      has filed an application for a patent related to its mesh
      crib liner with the United States Patent and Trademark
      Office, and, along with other costs related to CCIP’s
      patent application, the Company has capitalized the defense
      costs associated with the BreathableBaby litigation in the
      accompanying consolidated balance sheets.  In the
      event of an unfavorable outcome with respect to the
      BreathableBaby litigation or a denial of CCIP’s patent
      application, the Company would be required to recognize an
      impairment charge amounting to these accumulated
      costs.
     
      In
      addition to the foregoing civil complaint, the Company is,
      from time to time, involved in various other legal and
      regulatory proceedings relating to claims arising in the
      ordinary course of its business.  Neither the
      Company nor any of its subsidiaries is a party to any such
      proceeding the outcome of which, individually or in the
      aggregate, is expected to have a material adverse effect on
      the Company’s financial condition, results of
      operations or cash flows.
     |